The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebs were notably consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable sites providing both free casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income in 2015 alone. Now the business faces allegations of unlawful gaming in a New york city lawsuit that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences in between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social element of the casinos, while omitting the capacity for real gambling losses.

Others tempt clients with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's vehicles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The inconsistency in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'

Social casinos offer customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with buddies. Players have the alternative to buy valueless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be used to open various functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing clients to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's cars and trucks, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but 7 states, which has assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require typically need identification. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to send mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, therefore providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of casino games for a chance to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online gaming sites like gambling establishments.'

Think of the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that provide them the opportunity to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't satisfy the meaning of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all sort of daily companies in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous sports betting market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, therefore recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're normally not connected to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the qualities frequently connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payments, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue made by the business [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, using customers the opportunity to play casino-style games for real rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually since been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with similar analysis.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have repeatedly been cited by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key consider determining that a sweepstakes promo was in reality a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are passing up substantial tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming changes that carried out through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most current claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited gaming business. '

Apple and Google have actually also been named as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We typically don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just excellent video games, user experiences and entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical throughout the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to strongly defend any claim which might be brought against us.'

The concerns between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos might show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the same time the leagues desire to predict a strong position versus illegal sports betting - especially when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting presumably prohibited sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to explain to consumers the differences and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our worths are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at danger as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton